Democrat war on women: Ann Romney “has never worked a day in her life”

Ann Romney is a breast cancer survivor living with MS, a 64-year-old mother of 5 and grandmother of 16.

More big-hearted understanding from the hypocrite Left.

Ann Romney tweeted back:
Dana Loesch at Breitbart:

Hilary Rosen, a partner at SKDKnickerbocker, the PR firm of former Obama communications director Anita Dunn, charged that Ann Romney “hasn’t worked a day in her life” and suggested that Ann Romney can’t possibly understand economic issues because she’s a lowly homemaker.

What you have is Mitt Romney running around the country saying, “Well, my wife tells me what women really care about are economic issues.” And, “When I listen to my wife, that’s what I’m hearing.” Guess what? His wife has never actually worked a day in her life. She’s never really dealt with the economic issues that a majority of the women in this country are facing—in terms of how do we feed our kids, how do we send them to school, and how do—why we worry about their future.

In the same breath Rosen ironically says:

… there’s something much more fundamental about Mitt Romney—he just seems so old-fashioned when it comes to women, and I think that comes across, and I think that’s going to hurt him over the long term. He just doesn’t really see us as equal.

Yes, there is something old-fashioned about the belief that a homemaker couldn’t understand the complexity of the economics affecting her household. Rosen apparently subscribes to the Linda Hirschman worldview, one that posits women are only as valuable as their contributions outside the home, unrelated to children and family. Rearing up the next generation that will someday run the world is woefully under appreciated.

From an overflow of the heart the mouth speaks and Rosen makes it clear that her prejudice against women who stay home stems from a lack of respect and appreciation for what those women do. If the goal of feminism is choice, Rosen betrays the mutual respect amongst members of the female sex by degrading the choices of other women.

Considering Ann Romney is a breast cancer survivor who reared five children and played the backbone to her successful husband, I’m not sure this is a battle Democrats want to pick — especially with an opponent like Ann Romney, a breast cancer survivor living with MS who raised five children.

Also:

For more on Democrat double-standard hypocrisy, see Michelle Malkin’s piece: The Left’s war on conservative women: We’re damned if we do stay home, and damned if we don’t

Hotair Update: Democrats were quick to insist that Rosen has no role at the White House, but Jim Geraghty reports that the rebuttal seems to be more of an issue of semantics:

White House visitor logs indicate that “Hilary Rosen” visited the White House thirty-five times.

Gen. David Petraeus, head of our efforts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the current CIA director, nine times.

Meanwhile, see if you can guess who said this in 2008?

“You know essentially, you’ve taken on sort of the most sympathetic person in the candidate’s realm, the wife, who is taking care of the children, supporting the husband, doing everything she can because she loves him … [it's a] stupid strategy.”

About these ads
By Say It Ain't So Posted in Omerika

2 comments on “Democrat war on women: Ann Romney “has never worked a day in her life”

  1. of course, the left and the left’s “so called women” are just wonderful. After all they were all singing the praises of the “new, big endorser” for Elizabeth Warren and her run for senate in Mass. Who was this new endorser, Planned parenthood. Now if that doesn’t explain their stance on Mrs. Romney then what does? The Murdering GIANT PLANNED PARENTHOOD is considered a prize, yet a woman who runs a household, and raised productive, good husbands, and Christian boys, fighting life threatening diseases, doesn’t count. Now there is a nice poster that should be hung from the rafters.

  2. OK. Hilary said something poorly, but accurately Mitt Romney said that poor women should go to work as soon as there children were 2 yrs. so that they could “experience the dignity of working. ” Hmmmmm. Then the Catholic League said that at least Anne was able to give birth to 5 sons. Hilary had to “adopt” hers. Hmmm. Where is the outrage???????? Are people who are unable to children ‘less than’ fertile women? Maybe children who cannot be ‘mothered’ by there biological moms should just be housed vs. ‘adopted’ by loving people not capable of reproducing. Hmmmm. Oh, AND Hilary is GAY!!!! Oh, for sure those dear little motherless should be housed on foster care instead of being adopted! That is a muchore sensible solution.

    Mitt and Ann Romney are smug snobs. And the Catholic League is mean, heartless and pedophlile panders.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s