Sheriff Arpaio: Obama birth certificate a “computer-generated forgery”

It is absolutely a forgery.

Watch the six short videos below released by Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse. You’ll see that there can be no question that Obama’s long form certificate and his selective service card are both forgeries. Not only are they forged, they are poorly forged.

The only real question is, what will congress do about it? But we know the answer to that, don’t we? Cowards.

Washington Times – PHOENIX — Armed with a new 10-page report he commissioned, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said Thursday he suspects the birth certificate President Obama released last year is a “computer-generated forgery” — and also raised questions about the authenticity of the president’s selective service registration card.

In an extensive — and at times combative — press conference in Phoenix, Sheriff Arpaio repeatedly said he is not questioning the president’s legal status under the Constitution nor alleging fraud on Mr. Obama’s part, but did say there is evidence crimes have been committed by someone and his investigation continues.

“Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic,” Sheriff Arpaio said. “My investigators believe that the long-form birth certificate was manufactured electronically and that it did not originate in paper format as claimed by the White House.”

He said he would like Congress to investigate the matter, but short of that, he has an obligation to look into is because of potential violations of Arizona’s laws.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.  (more >>>)

Also, see WND  (videos at bottom)

[...] – The Cold Case Posse advised Arpaio that they believe forgers committed two crimes. First, they say it appears the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

“A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery,” Arpaio said.

Among the evidence released at the press conference are five videos – which can be seen at the end of this article – to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.

The videos consist of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document. They display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.

The investigators contend the videos illustrate their conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan is enhanced by Optical Character Recognition, OCR, and optimized.

Additionally, the posse says, the videos demonstrate that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar’s name stamp and the registrar’s date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.

“That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself,” Zullo said, emphasizing that if the registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.

The investigators also chronicled a series of allegedly inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding any original birth records held by the Hawaii Department of Health.

“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”

Arpaio emphasized that the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm and electronic records to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.

The sheriff said the president should also authorize Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any  hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, to provide corroboration for the records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault. (more >>>)

1. Introduction – Regular Scan:

2. Layers, Stamp & Noise

3. OCR Theory

4. Optimization

5. Conclusion

6. Selective Service

Truly, this is the biggest scandal in the history of the U.S. presidency. It is the greatest wad of wool ever pulled over the American public’s eyes. Yet, even more scandalous is the lack of interest by American so-called journalists. Their complacency, and complicity, represents the truest danger to the Republic.

About these ads

6 comments on “Sheriff Arpaio: Obama birth certificate a “computer-generated forgery”

  1. Pingback: Washington Times: Forgerygate – Ignoring Arpaio’s evidence of Obama’s forgery is a scandal in itself | Quite Normal

  2. Pingback: New film: Barack Obama’s real father was communist Frank Marshall Davis | Quite Normal

  3. Pingback: Say what?! – Breitbart uncovers 1991 promotional booklet touting Obama as “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii” | Quite Normal

  4. Pingback: Obama himself was the first “birther” | Quite Normal

  5. Pingback: Diana West, Frank Gaffney question Obama’s eligibility | Quite Normal

  6. Pingback: 10 things Obama will never release | Quite Normal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s